Usefulness of EOB-MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) pharmacotherapy

Nagasaki University Hospital  
Drs. Ryu Sasaki and Kazuhiko Nakao, Dept. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

DATE : 2021

Introduction

Patient’s background

Patient’s background

Male; 60s; body weight: 57 kg; HCC

Assessment objectives

A nucleic acid analog was administered for chronic hepatitis B by the previous physician, and periodic monitoring was continued. Alpha-fetoprotein increase was found, and abnormalities were shown by abdominal ultrasonography, so the patient was referred to the authors’ hospital for thorough tests and additional treatment, and EOB-MRI was performed.

Contrast agent used

Gadoxetate disodium(Gd-EOB-DTPA) injection, 0.1 mL/kg

Case explanation

On the basis of the EOB-MRI results, the diagnosis made was HCC with associated tumor embolism as far as the portal vein main trunk. In the EOB-MRI hepatobiliary phase, the lesion did not show a heterogeneous high signal, and did show a homogeneous low signal, and it was considered possible that combination immunotherapy would be effective. Combination immunotherapy (combined with atezolizumab + bevacizumab) for nonresectable advanced liver cancer with associated Vp4 portal vein tumor embolism was therefore initiated. After completion of four cycles, although a remnant of the portal vein tumor embolism was found, the hepatic mass had markedly decreased in size, and radical resection (right lobectomy + portal vein thrombectomy) was performed after completion of the fifth cycle. At present, the patient has been monitored for the 14 months since surgery, without reinitiation of pharmacotherapy or recurrence.

Imaging findings

 Fig. 1. Pretreatment simple EOB-MRI

A multinodular lesion was found in the anterior segment of the right lobe of the liver, and part of it was branched.

Fig. 1. Pretreatment simple EOB-MRI
 Fig. 2. Pretreatment early phase

A mass lesion in the anterior segment of the right lobe of the liver was slightly dark staining.

Fig. 2. Pretreatment early phase
 Fig. 3. Pretreatment late phase

The mass lesion in the anterior segment of the right lobe of the liver showed wash-out, with the branched part corresponding to the route of the portal vein, and the possibility of it being a portal vein tumor embolism was considered.

Fig. 3. Pretreatment late phase
 Fig. 4. Pretreatment hepatobiliary phase

The mass lesion in the anterior segment of the right lobe of the liver showed a homogeneous low signal, and no heterogeneously high-signal region was found.

Fig. 4. Pretreatment hepatobiliary phase
Fig. 5. Hepatobiliary phase after four treatment cycles

Although part of the portal vein tumor embolism remained, the mass in the anterior segment of the right lobe of the liver showed marked reduction in size.

Fig. 5. Hepatobiliary phase after four treatment cycles

Photography protocol

Imaging typePhotography   
sequence
Photography 
duration (s)
TE    
(msec)
TR    
(msec)
FA    
(deg)
Flipback   
(yes/no)
Fat sat   
(type)
ETL   
(number)
P-MRI    
(Reduction Factor)
Coronal section, T2-weighted imagingHASTE1780.00728.0120NoGRAPPA 3
Dual echoFLASH(3D-VIBE)181.38    
2.46
4.210CAIPIRINHA3    
(p1s3)
Contrast agent administration
Dynamic   
(artery)
FLASH(3D-VIBE)101.002.89Fast Fat    
Ssturation
CAIPIRINHA3    
(p1s3)
Dynamic   
(venous)
FLASH(3D-VIBE)161.093.110Fast Fat    
Ssturation
CAIPIRINHA3    
(p1s3)
T2WIHASTE1896.00700.0120NoGRAPPA 2
Fat-suppressed, T2-weighted imagingTSE15 x 276.003000.0120NoSPAIR21GRAPPA 3
DWIEPIDiaphragm synchronization52.002500.0SPAIRGRAPPA 2
Hepatobiliary phaseFLASH(3D-VIBE)181.193.210Fast Fat    
Ssturation
CAIPIRINHA3    
(p1s3)
Coronal section, hepatobiliary phaseFLASH(3D-VIBE)181.133.010Fast Fat    
Ssturation
GRAPPA 4    
(p4)
Sagittal section, 
hepatobiliary phase
FLASH(3D-VIBE)171.133.010Fast Fat    
Ssturation
CAIPIRINHA3    
(p1s3)
Imaging typeHolding breath   
(yes/no)
NEX   
(calculation   
number)
k-spaceIn-plane   
resolution   
(mm)
Slice   
thickness   
(mm)
FOV   
(mm)
Rectangu-lar   
FOV(%)
Phase direction   
(step number)
Coronal section, 
T2-weighted imaging
Yes1Linear0.94 x 0.946.036075.0288
Dual echoYes1Linear1.13 x 1.133.036075.0168
Contrast agent administration
Dynamic     
(artery)
Yes1Centric1.25 x 1.253.036075.0162
Dynamic     
(venous)
Yes1Centric1.13 x 1.133.036075.0180
T2WIYes1Linear0.94 x 0.946.036075.0173
Fat-suppressed,  
T2-weighted imaging
Yes1Linear1.13 x 1.136.036075.0195
DWINo4Linear2.43 x 2.436.036075.078
Hepatobiliary phaseYes1Centric1.13 x 1.132.036075.0168
Coronal section, hepatobiliary phaseYes1Linear1.13 x 1.133.036075.0240
Sagittal section,
hepatobiliary phase
Yes1Centric1.13 x 1.133.036075.0168
Imaging typeRead direction 
(matrix number)
Actual 
scan (%)
Slice Gap 
(mm)
Slice 
number
Three-dimensional partition numberThree-dimensional actual scan (%)3D over 
sampling(%)
Coronal section, 
T2-weighted imaging
384751.523
Dual echo32070806020.0
Contrast agent administration
Dynamic 
(artery)
28875805020.0
Dynamic 
(venous)
32075806020.0
T2WI384601.826
Fat-suppressed, 
T2-weighted imaging
320811.826
DWI148701.826
Hepatobiliary phase320701205033.3
Coronal section,
hepatobiliary phase
32075726511.1
Sagittal section,
hepatobiliary phase
320701046423.1

Devices used and contrast conditions

MRI deviceSIEMENS MAGNETOM Vida
Automatic injection deviceSonic Shot 7 (Nemoto Kyorindo)
WorkstationFUJIFILM SYNAPSE VINCENT
Contrast conditions Dose (mL)Administration rate  
(mL/s)
Photography timing
Gadoxetate disodium(Gd-EOB-DTPA)5.71.5The details of bolus-tracking are shown in the Comments column.
Physiological saline solution for flushing201.5

Dynamic EOB-MRI started the photography of a coronal-section CARE Bolus sequence, after which contrast agent injection was initiated. After real-time monitoring, and approximately 7 s after the contrast agent had reached the pulmonary artery, imaging was performed during the arterial phase (two consecutive 10-s periods during one breath-holding episode), followed by imaging at three time-points during the venous phase (immediately, 60 s after, and 120 s after completion of the arterial phase). Imaging in the hepatobiliary phase was performed from 20 minutes after injection of the contrast medium.

Usefulness of Gadoxetate disodium(Gd-EOB-DTPA) contrast MRI with this patient

It was shown by EOB-MRI that the lesion was HCC with associated portal vein tumor embolism, not showing a heterogeneous high signal, and combined immunotherapy (combined with atezolizumab + bevacizumab) was initiated. The EOB-MRI hepatobiliary phase is known to show imaging biomarkers for Wnt/β-catenin mutations in HCC (Ueno et al., J Hepatol 61: 1080-1087, 2014), and it has been pointed out that heterogeneously high-signal lesions may show poor responses to combined immunotherapy (Sasaki et al., Cancers 14: 827, 2022). Although this does not ensure therapeutic effect, with this patient a homogeneously low signal was shown in the hepatobiliary phase, and the combination immunotherapy is expected to show therapeutic efficacy.

The “Indications and effects” for Gadoxetate disodium(Gd-EOB-DTPA) Injection Syringe are shown below, and there is no indication predicting the therapeutic efficacy of the drug.

Excerpt from package insert

4. Indications and effects  
Hepatic tumor imaging with magnetic resonance computed tomography

  • *The case introduced is just one clinical case, so the results are not the same as for all cases.
  • *Please refer to the Package Insert for the effects and indications, dosage and administration method, and warnings, contraindications, and other precautions with use.