Monitoring of nonhypervolemic lesions

Iwate Medical University Hospital  
Dr. Akio Tamura, Dept. of Radiology  
Dr. Shun Abe, Division of Central Radiology

DATE : 2021

Introduction

Patient’s background and MRI objectives

Patient’s background

Female; 60s; body weight: 77 kg; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

Assessment objectives

EOB-MRI was performed before surgery for HCC in S8 of the liver, and in the hepatobiliary phase a low-signal nodule was found in S4. Partial resection of S8 of the liver was performed, followed by periodic EOB-MRI as monitoring.

Contrast agent used

Gadoxetate disodium(Gd-EOB-DTPA) injection, 0.1 mL/kg

Case explanation

The lesion in S4 of the liver expanded during the clinical course, and MRI after 26 months showed wash-out in the portal phase, but no dark staining in the early phase. After 46 months, dark staining was shown in the early phase, and T2-weighted imaging also showed a faint high-signal lesion. 
Due to the definite signs of HCC, radiofrequency ablation was performed. Multiple lesions were found in the liver during monitoring, including similar nonhypervolemic lesions and lesions associated with typical early-phase dark staining.

Imaging findings

Fig. 2. T1-, T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging

A small, low-signal nodule was found in S4 of the liver in the hepatobiliary phase (arrow). 
Dark staining in the early phase and wash-out were not found, and the signs with T2-weighted imaging were not clear. 
Regenerative nodules were occasionally seen in the background.

Fig. 1. EOB-MRI at initial examination (from left to right: fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging; arterial phase; portal phase; hepatobiliary phase)
Fig. 2. EOB-MRI after 26 months (from left to right: fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging; arterial phase; portal phase; hepatobiliary phase)

One lesion in S4 of the liver was found to have expanded, and wash-out could now be seen in the portal phase (arrow). 
Early-phase dark staining was not clear, and even T2-weighted imaging showed an isosignal with the surrounding liver parenchyma. 
Similarly, a low signal in S4 of the liver was shown in the hepatobiliary phase, and a lesion associated with early-phase dark staining was found (arrowhead).

Fig. 2. EOB-MRI after 26 months (from left to right: fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging; arterial phase; portal phase; hepatobiliary phase)
Fig. 3. EOB-MRI after 46 months (from left to right: fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging; arterial phase; portal phase; hepatobiliary phase)

Together with swelling-type expansion of the lesion in S4, nodule-in-nodule-type dark staining was found in the lesion interior in the early phase, and a high-signal region was found with T2-weighted imaging (arrow).

Fig. 3. EOB-MRI after 46 months (from left to right: fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging; arterial phase; portal phase; hepatobiliary phase)

Photography protocol

Imaging typePhotography 
sequence
Photography 
duration 
(min:s)
TE  
(msec)
TR  
(msec)
FA  
(deg)
Fat sat 
(type)
ETL 
(number)
P-MRI 
(Reduction Factor)
Holding breath 
(yes/no)
Dual echo3D-GRE(LAVA)20Minimum  
(1.1 2.2)
5.0602.0Yes
Contrast agent administration
Dynamic3D-GRE(LAVA)202.04.612Chem SAT  
(Special)
2.0Yes
DWIEPI1:48Minimum  
(74.6)
effective TR  
(4000~7000)
Chem SAT  
(Special)
2.0No
T2WIPROPELLER3:2891.7effective TR  
(4000~7000)
140Chem SAT  
(Fat)
28No
Hepatobiliary phase3D-GRE(LAVA)181.94.112Chem SAT  
(Special)
2.0Yes
Hepatobiliary phase Cor3D-GRE(LAVA)181.94.112Chem SAT  
(Special)
2.0Yes
Imaging typeNEX  
(calculation  
number)
k-spaceIn-plane 
resolution 
(mm)
Slice 
thickness 
(mm)
FOV  
(mm)
Rectangu-lar  
FOV(%)
Phase direction 
(step number)
Read direction 
(matrix number)
Slice Gap  
(mm)
Slice 
number
Dual echo1.0sequential1.3×1.54.0380802562882.050
Contrast agent administration
Dynamic1.0sequential1.3×1.54.03808025628850 (using ZIP)
DWI2.0sequential2.7×2.48.03801001601402.020
T2WI1.0radial1.3×1.38.03802882882.020
Hepatobiliary phase1.0sequential1.3×1.54.03808025628850 (using ZIP)
Hepatobiliary phase Cor1.0sequential1.3×1.54.03808025628850 (using ZIP)

Devices used and contrast conditions

MRI deviceSigna Architect
Automatic injection deviceSonic Shot 7
Workstation
Contrast conditions Dose (mL)Administration rate  
(mL/s)
Photography timing
Gadoxetate disodium(Gd-EOB-DTPA)0.1mL/kg10-s injectionInitiation when the contrast agent reached the left ventricle (approximately 30 s, approximately 70 s, and approximately 135 s)
Physiological saline solution for flushing30mLSame speed as contrast agent

Usefulness of Gadoxetate disodium(Gd-EOB-DTPA) contrast MRI with this patient

Lesions that show low signals in the hepatobiliary phase of EOB-MRI without dark staining in the early phase include advanced liver cancer, early-stage liver cancer, high-grade dysplastic nodules, low-grade dysplastic nodules, and regenerative nodules(1). It is known that most nonhypervolemic lesions gradually become hypervolemic, over a period of a year or more, and EOB-MRI is a modality that could be used to examine this change(2). In addition, although the time-point at which treatment of nonhypervolemic lesions is initiated appears to differ between institutions, at least during monitoring EOB-MRI is considered to be indispensable for clear detection of HCC, which is the target for treatment.

  1. Joo I, et al. Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation of Hepatobiliary Phase Hypointense Nodules without Arterial Phase Hyperenhancement at Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI: A Multicenter Study. Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):335-345.
  2. Suh CH, et al. Hypervascular Transformation of Hypovascular Hypointense Nodules in the Hepatobiliary Phase of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Oct;209(4):781-789.
  • *The case introduced is just one clinical case, so the results are not the same as for all cases.
  • *Please refer to the Package Insert for the effects and indications, dosage and administration method, and warnings, contraindications, and other precautions with use.